1975 Datsun 280Z vs. 2013 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKS (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1975 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln MKS weights approximately 612 kg more than 1975 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Lincoln MKS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Datsun 280Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKS (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Datsun 280Z | 2013 Lincoln MKS | |
| Make | Datsun | Lincoln |
| Model | 280Z | MKS |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2753 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1304 kg | 1916 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4399 mm | 5222 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1631 mm | 2172 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2304 mm | 2868 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |
