1975 Dodge Aspen vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 34 kg more than 1975 Dodge Aspen.
Because 1975 Dodge Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Dodge Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Dodge Aspen (333 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (248 Nm). This means 1975 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Dodge Aspen | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Aspen | Sable |
Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 333 Nm | 248 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2760 mm |