1975 Dodge Aspen vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Dodge Aspen (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Dodge Aspen should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 217 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Dodge Aspen (333 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1975 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Dodge Aspen | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Aspen | Ranger |
Year Released | 1975 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 333 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1323 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2990 mm |