1975 Dodge Aspen vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1975 Dodge Aspen. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1975 Dodge Aspen.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Dodge Aspen. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Dodge Aspen. (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Dodge Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Dodge Aspen | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Aspen | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 117.5 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3010 mm |