1975 Dodge Aspen vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Dodge Aspen would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 145 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 1975 Dodge Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Dodge Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Dodge Aspen (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1975 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Dodge Aspen | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Dodge | Mini |
Model | Aspen | Countryman |
Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 117.5 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2595 mm |