1975 Ferrari 512 BB vs. 2009 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Ferrari 512 BB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Ferrari 512 BB would be higher. At 4,942 cc, 1975 Ferrari 512 BB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Ferrari 512 BB (339 HP) has 76 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Sable. (263 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Ferrari 512 BB should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 412 kg more than 1975 Ferrari 512 BB.

Because 1975 Ferrari 512 BB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Ferrari 512 BB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Ferrari 512 BB (452 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Sable. (338 Nm). This means 1975 Ferrari 512 BB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Sable. 2009 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1975 Ferrari 512 BB has manual transmission. 1975 Ferrari 512 BB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Ferrari 512 BB 2009 Mercury Sable
Make Ferrari Mercury
Model 512 BB Sable
Year Released 1975 2009
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 3496 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 339 HP 263 HP
Torque 452 Nm 338 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.2:1 10.3:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1514 kg 1926 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 5140 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1130 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2870 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]