1975 Fiat 128 vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1975 Fiat 128. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1975 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 775 kg more than 1975 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Fiat 128 | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 128 | Clio |
Year Released | 1975 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 250 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1640 mm |