1975 Fiat 131 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Fiat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Fiat 131 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 286 more horse power than 1975 Fiat 131. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1975 Fiat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 325 kg more than 1975 Fiat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Fiat 131. (102 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Fiat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Fiat 131 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 131 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1975 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 350 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 556 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |