1975 Ford Fairlane vs. 2001 Saturn SC
To start off, 2001 Saturn SC is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,096 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Ford Fairlane (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2001 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2001 Saturn SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 380 kg more than 2001 Saturn SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Ford Fairlane (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Saturn SC. (155 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1975 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Ford Fairlane | 2001 Saturn SC | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | Fairlane | SC |
Year Released | 1975 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4096 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2610 mm |