1975 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Mazda 3

To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,096 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Ford Fairlane (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Ford Fairlane (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (140 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1975 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Ford Fairlane 2003 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Fairlane 3
Year Released 1975 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4096 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 326 Nm 140 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93.5 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.3 mm 78.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2650 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]