1975 Holden Belmont vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Holden Belmont (116 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 633 kg more than 1975 Holden Belmont.
Because 1975 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Holden Belmont (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1975 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Holden Belmont | 2005 Kia Shuma II | |
Make | Holden | Kia |
Model | Belmont | Shuma II |
Year Released | 1975 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 1593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1958 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2910 mm |