1975 Holden Belmont vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1975 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1975 Holden Belmont.
Because 1975 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Holden Belmont. (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Holden Belmont | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Belmont | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2834 cc | 2298 cc |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
