1975 Holden Belmont vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1975 Holden Belmont. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1975 Holden Belmont.
Because 1975 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Holden Belmont. (228 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Holden Belmont | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Belmont | Epica |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |