1975 Honda 1300 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1975 Honda 1300 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 340 kg more than 1975 Honda 1300.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Honda 1300 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Honda | Riley |
| Model | 1300 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1496 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2870 mm |
