1975 Jaguar XJS vs. 2008 Renault Clio

To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 5,342 cc (12 cylinders), 1975 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 785 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.

Because 1975 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Jaguar XJS (431 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1975 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Jaguar XJS 2008 Renault Clio
Make Jaguar Renault
Model XJS Clio
Year Released 1975 2008
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5342 cc 1149 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 291 HP 0 HP
Torque 431 Nm 105 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 12.5:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 241 km/hour 165 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 8 seconds 13 seconds
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1770 kg 985 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2480 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.1 L/100km 6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 86 L 50 L