1975 Lada 1200 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Lada 1200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1975 Lada 1200. (61 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1975 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Lada 1200 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Lada 1200. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Lada 1200 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Lada | MCC |
| Model | 1200 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1810 mm |
