1975 Lada 1200 vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,803 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (180 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1975 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1975 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 189 kg more than 1975 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Celica (176 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Lada 1200. (87 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Lada 1200 | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Lada | Toyota |
Model | 1200 | Celica |
Year Released | 1975 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 55 L |