1975 Lada S vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Lada S would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1975 Lada S.
Because 1975 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1975 Lada S has manual transmission. 1975 Lada S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Lada S | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | S | 6 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2488 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |