1975 Lotus Eclat vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi A3 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1975 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1975 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Lotus Eclat | 2011 Audi A3 | |
Make | Lotus | Audi |
Model | Eclat | A3 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1972 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2578 mm |