1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera.
Because 1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Matra-Simca Bagheera | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Ford |
| Model | Bagheera | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2490 mm |
