1975 Mazda 616 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 576 kg more than 1975 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda 616 | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 616 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1975 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 305 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |