1975 Mazda 616 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 195 kg more than 1975 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (126 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda 616 | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | 616 | Polo |
Year Released | 1975 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 75.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2470 mm |