1975 Mazda 616 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 422 kg more than 1975 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda 616 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 616 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3710 mm |