1975 Mazda 616 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 616. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mazda 616 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | 616 | XF |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2908 mm |
