1975 Mazda 818 vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,272 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Mazda 818 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda 818 (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda 818 should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda 818 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda 818 (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1975 Mazda 818 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda 818 | 1999 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 818 | Smart |
Year Released | 1975 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2280 mm |