1975 Mazda 818 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 818. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 818.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 818. (92 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda 818 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 818 | UTE |
Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 92 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |