1975 Mazda 929 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda 929 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda 929 (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1975 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda 929 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 929 | Clio |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |