1975 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1975 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda 929 | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 929 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |