1975 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1959 Triumph Herald

To start off, 1975 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1975 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda Cosmo (115 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 402 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda Cosmo (162 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 1975 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Mazda Cosmo 1959 Triumph Herald
Make Mazda Triumph
Model Cosmo Herald
Year Released 1975 1959
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2292 cc 948 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 38 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 162 Nm 83 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1164 kg 762 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2330 mm