1975 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1975 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 2,616 cc (2 cylinders), 1975 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer has automatic transmission and 1975 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1975 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mazda Cosmo | 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cosmo | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
