1975 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1977 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1977 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 270 kg more than 1977 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda Cosmo | 1977 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cosmo | Colt |
Year Released | 1975 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2310 mm |