1975 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Ford Windstar is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (115 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda Cosmo | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Cosmo | Windstar |
Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3066 mm |