1975 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,616 cc (2 cylinders), 1975 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda Cosmo (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 43 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda Cosmo (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Cosmo | 3 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1192 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2650 mm |