1975 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | RX-2 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3340 mm |