1975 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Lada Niva
To start off, 2010 Lada Niva is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1975 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2010 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lada Niva weights approximately 325 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2010 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Mazda | Lada |
| Model | RX-2 | Niva |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2210 mm |
