1975 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1975 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1975 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (136 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mazda RX-3 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-3 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2685 mm |
