1975 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (136 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mazda RX-3 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | RX-3 | XF |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |
