1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 605 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Mazda | Jeep |
| Model | RX 4 Coupe | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4138 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2423 mm |
