1975 Mercury Comet vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,272 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1975 Mercury Comet. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1975 Mercury Comet.
Because 1975 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mercury Comet (197 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1975 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mercury Comet | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Comet | Cube |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3272 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2830 mm |