1975 Mini Clubman vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1106 kg more than 1975 Mini Clubman.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mini Clubman | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mini | Cadillac |
| Model | Clubman | CTS |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2880 mm |
