1975 Mini Clubman vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1056 kg more than 1975 Mini Clubman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1975 Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1975 Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mini Clubman | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Mini | Chevrolet |
| Model | Clubman | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1706 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2858 mm |
