1975 Mini MK III vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mini MK III would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1975 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 164 kg more than 1975 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mini MK III | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mini | Zastava |
| Model | MK III | 102 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2160 mm |
