1975 Mini MK III vs. 1996 Toyota Celica

To start off, 1996 Toyota Celica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mini MK III would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1975 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1975 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Celica weights approximately 485 kg more than 1975 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mini MK III.

Compare all specifications: