1975 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 585 kg more than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Celeste | 6C |
Year Released | 1975 | 1940 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1439 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3010 mm |