1975 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 2010 Audi R8
To start off, 2010 Audi R8 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 335 more horse power than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2010 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi R8 (429 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (131 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | 2010 Audi R8 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
Model | Celeste | R8 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 429 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1252 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2649 mm |