1975 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1006 kg more than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Celeste | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1439 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2748 mm |
