1975 Mitsubishi Jeep vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 2,383 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Mitsubishi Jeep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mitsubishi Jeep (102 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mitsubishi Jeep should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1975 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mitsubishi Jeep | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Jeep | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2383 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2490 mm |