1975 Nissan 240 C vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 1986 Rover 825 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Rover 825 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Rover 825 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1975 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1975 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Rover 825, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Nissan 240 C | 1986 Rover 825 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | 240 C | 825 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |