1975 Nissan 240 C vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo V40 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1975 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1975 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Nissan 240 C | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | 240 C | V40 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |
