1975 Nissan 240 C vs. 2003 Noble M14
To start off, 2003 Noble M14 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Noble M14 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 Noble M14.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Nissan 240 C | 2003 Noble M14 | |
| Make | Nissan | Noble |
| Model | 240 C | M14 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 396 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2440 mm |
